Skip to main content

Research Paper Towards 2G Spectrum

Research Paper towards 2G Spectrum

In 2007, at the time of Congress Government when the 2G network was about to be launch government was in a dilemma on what basis the Government should sell the frequencies to the telecom industry. There was only two option either to sell it on AUCTION or the basis of the tender "FIRST COME FIRST SERVE".

But the biggest problem was that if the government sell it on the auction it will result in a higher cost to the telecom industry, as a result, the call rates will be high and the second option was based on First Come First Serve, So to remove the unnecessary burden to the consumer, the government has opted for FCFS option.

What is tender or FCFS?

- In this method, the Government at a random fix a date and the value of the tender and whichever company comes first and pays such value the tender will be given to him.
This Government has sold the 2G frequency to some of the telecom players.
But after complete inspection and investigation government found that there is some default in the 2G spectrum, the default was that the tender was done by a fixing in which Congress government has fixed a pre-deal in which they have leaked all the details to some of the telecom players and has greases their palm.

A. Raja was the telecom minister at the time of scam but due to blames and questions from oppositions and court, he had decided for the resignation of the post.
The scam was the biggest one, as the NDA government started questioning on UPA government about the scam. It alleged that PM Manmohan Singh and Home Minister P. Chidambaram knew about the scam as well and thus is accused of shielding A. Raja. Subramaniam Swami, leader of Janta Dal(S) then filed a case against PM Manmohan Singh also in the Supreme Court followed by one against P. Chidambaram.

Controller and Auditor General (CAG) presented its report on the auctions and highlighted many irregularities in the same.

The CAG Report-

  • The report in its financial terms reported that policy followed by First come First Serve(FCFS) was not followed properly.
  • The entry fee was also calculated very low.
  • The report states that the entry fee was fixed on as same as that calculated in 2001 but should have been increased as the telecom market had grown in years that followed.
  • The CAG report focused on the procedural irregularities and undervaluation of Spectrum.
  • As a result, In 2012 The Supreme Court verdict that the UPA government has been accused of the scam, 122 licenses given out by DoT (Department of Telecom) under A. Raja over irregularities in the procedures followed.
Sources:-Analysis of various media channels (News18, NDTV Indian Express), Quora,Telecomtalk.info

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Effect of COVID-19 on Finance Broking Sector

EFFECT OF COVID-19 ON FINANCE BROKING SECTOR  Labeled as a global health emergency, the novel Coronavirus outbreak has widespread impact ranging from ecological to economic implications. Over 80 countries have collectively registered over 21,50,000 cases since the first reported case in December 2019 in China. With one of the world's biggest economies at the epicenter of the novel Coronavirus outbreak, the impact of the virus is being felt on the global market. Closer home, the Indian stock market has seen some significant dips owing to its geographical and economic closeness to China. How the COVID-19 affected the Stock market? Due to the SARS-COVID 19-Coronavirus pandemic, our India economy's stock market became much volatile and the effect was first felt at the end of February. On February 28TH India's Broking share market faced a massive crash; more than Rs. 6000 Crores in investor's wealth has been wiped out due to lack of confidence arise of scare due...

Financial Boundaries After Marriage: A Real-Life Dilemma

Marriage is not just about two people coming together; it’s also about two families, two financial habits, and two sets of responsibilities. One of the biggest challenges couples face after marriage is balancing financial obligations towards parents while also securing their own future. Let me share a real situation that many newly married couples might relate to. The Background Before marriage, my wife used to send around 40% of her salary to her parents. I respected that—after all, supporting one’s parents is a beautiful responsibility. But after marriage, I noticed that her parents weren’t in a difficult situation financially. In fact, they seemed to be overspending on lifestyle and shopping. Here’s our situation now: I earn ₹85,000 per month, and my wife earns ₹75,000 per month. To secure our family’s future, especially since my wife is now 5 months pregnant, we mutually decided to save my entire salary in her account. From her salary, ₹25,000–₹30,000 still goes to her pare...